On March 24th, Oakland University hosted an event inviting professor Bill Ayers to speak there.
This socialist stunt was sponsored by the OU chapter of the Students for a Democratic Society
(SDS) and several university departments. This is simply despicable! This is the same Bill Ayers that founded that terrorist group called the Weather Underground and held fundraising events for President Barack Obama at his own home. Defenders of Ayers will claim that he is a disting-uished professor of education at the University of Illinois at Chicago. Well, when you are respon-sible for bombing the Pentagon, the Capitol Building, and the New York City police headquarters, consider yourself 'distinguished.' Despite all that, Ayers still claims he still didn't do enough.
As an OU alumnus (B.S. degree in biology, 1992) and a conservative Republican, I'm outraged that my alma mater would do this. I however, am not shocked even though this happened only two months after President Obama took office. Our public universities are part of a breeding-
ground network of indoctrination. I guess the silver lining in this whole ordeal is that only about
150 people watched Ayers speak out of a college with over 15,000 students and over 75,000 alumni. Many people also protested the event with Ayers. Good for them! It's time patriotic Americans fought for what is truly right for this country. I'm disgusted at the state of our public education system in America today. I have a six-point plan of action that people can take to stick it to Oakland. Here's the agenda:
1) The OU Board of Trustees should write a letter of apology to all of the students, faculty, and
alumni for this embarrassing incident;
2) Various OU departments, like the OU Alumni Association and the athletics department,
should condemn those who brought Bill Ayers on campus;
3) OU alumni should refuse to donate to the university;
4) High school senoirs thinking of attending OU next fall should consider going to other colleges;
5) Republicans in the Michigan State Legislature should consider pushing a bill that would cut off
all public funding to OU to send a strong message that our public universities should never be
used as bully pulpits for socialist agendas, and;
6) OU students should hold a massive protest on Wednesday, April 15th (tax day) to fight
against the radical indoctrination of our young people. The campus has a lake called Beer Lake
situated between the dorm buildings and the classroom buildings. I'd love for thousands of OU
students to converge on Beer Lake and dump tea bags to protest the Communist takeover of
America at all levels of government. Then the students should officially change the name of
the lake from Beer Lake to Tea Lake. Now that's a protest statement!
I don't know if people could really do these things or how effective they would be, but I think we
need to do something before Oakland University invites Jeremiah Wright!
Tuesday, March 31, 2009
Monday, March 30, 2009
Power to the poop? God Help us!
(originally posted on St. Patrick's Day on www.macombgop.com)
I witnessed a fascinating event last Wednesday morning on Fox News. On America's Newsroom, anchorwoman Megyn Kelly was interviewing Dr. Jennifer Ashton on a study about sex. The study concluded that men can benefit from sexual activity because it can reduce the risk of certain diseases like heart disease, stroke, cancer, and diabetes. Sex can contribute to enhancing men's mental and physical health. I'm sure this research is 'ongoing.' The study also points out that men think about sex once every 52 seconds while women think about sex only once per day. This is why women control relationships. But I'm wondering why a study had to be done to confirm these findings. Men know this instinctively. But I'm glad the lovely Megyn reported on this. Now you know why I like Fox News.
At that moment, my libido was about to reach its crescendo. Then five minutes later, it crashed to the ground as Kelly's co-anchor, Bill Hemmer, interviewed Congresswoman Gwen Moore (D, WI) about an earmark that she sponsored that was recently passed and signed into law. It appropriates $500,000 so that human waste can be converted into electricity. Mrs. Moore actually used the phrase 'poop to power' to defend her case. And I'm not making this up like I did with the Democrats wanting to replace the Pentagon with the Square. This is an actual earmark. If we actually made electricity from manure, I can't imagine how our power grids would react to this new kind of renewable energy.
This is why Democrats shouldn't be put in charge of our government, and I'm not talking about earmarks here. Leave it up to Democrats to change my mindset from sweet love to smelly manure so quickly. Yet I can't blame Mrs. Moore for doing what she did. She thinks of sex only once a day. Perhaps that's the way it is for all Democrats. Back in the 1960s, the liberals wanted to give power to the people. Now they want to give power to the poop. God help us. This did nothing but ruin my day. Now here is how my brain went from love to poop in five minutes:
{While Megyn Kelly and Dr. Jennifer Ashton were discussing sex...}
There is a crowded ballroom. I strut into the room donning a white Armani tuxedo. At the opposite end of the room I spot Megyn Kelly wearing her black Gucci dress. Our eyes meet. We run towards each other and meet under the crystal chandelier. We start dancing as the orchestra plays a waltz. We make small talk as we are having the time of our lives. Then just as I was ready to kiss her...
{Congresswoman Gwen Moore talks about 'power to the poop' with Bill Hemmer...}
And the next thing you know, I'm thrown into the middle of a cesspool. To make matters worse, my tuxedo is ruined and Megyn takes off with another man. Oh, well. C'est la vie! Gwen Moore destroyed my day. I think that manure would be put to better use if it were converted into fertilizer that would be placed on the grass in the Washington, DC mall. That would force the Democrats to leave town very quickly. The Democrats should get out of our government and our excrement immediately. Come to think of it, the two are very similar to each other.
For the sake of full disclosure, I have an autographed picture of Megyn Kelly. I sent her a St. Valentine's card last year. I wrote a note requesting her picture, and she obliged. So at least you know what's on my mind every 52 seconds. But I can't help it. I'm a man and a Republican. Happy St. Patrick's Day!
G.J. LaRouche, 30 March 2009 (originally posted on 17 March 2009 on www.macombgop.com)
I witnessed a fascinating event last Wednesday morning on Fox News. On America's Newsroom, anchorwoman Megyn Kelly was interviewing Dr. Jennifer Ashton on a study about sex. The study concluded that men can benefit from sexual activity because it can reduce the risk of certain diseases like heart disease, stroke, cancer, and diabetes. Sex can contribute to enhancing men's mental and physical health. I'm sure this research is 'ongoing.' The study also points out that men think about sex once every 52 seconds while women think about sex only once per day. This is why women control relationships. But I'm wondering why a study had to be done to confirm these findings. Men know this instinctively. But I'm glad the lovely Megyn reported on this. Now you know why I like Fox News.
At that moment, my libido was about to reach its crescendo. Then five minutes later, it crashed to the ground as Kelly's co-anchor, Bill Hemmer, interviewed Congresswoman Gwen Moore (D, WI) about an earmark that she sponsored that was recently passed and signed into law. It appropriates $500,000 so that human waste can be converted into electricity. Mrs. Moore actually used the phrase 'poop to power' to defend her case. And I'm not making this up like I did with the Democrats wanting to replace the Pentagon with the Square. This is an actual earmark. If we actually made electricity from manure, I can't imagine how our power grids would react to this new kind of renewable energy.
This is why Democrats shouldn't be put in charge of our government, and I'm not talking about earmarks here. Leave it up to Democrats to change my mindset from sweet love to smelly manure so quickly. Yet I can't blame Mrs. Moore for doing what she did. She thinks of sex only once a day. Perhaps that's the way it is for all Democrats. Back in the 1960s, the liberals wanted to give power to the people. Now they want to give power to the poop. God help us. This did nothing but ruin my day. Now here is how my brain went from love to poop in five minutes:
{While Megyn Kelly and Dr. Jennifer Ashton were discussing sex...}
There is a crowded ballroom. I strut into the room donning a white Armani tuxedo. At the opposite end of the room I spot Megyn Kelly wearing her black Gucci dress. Our eyes meet. We run towards each other and meet under the crystal chandelier. We start dancing as the orchestra plays a waltz. We make small talk as we are having the time of our lives. Then just as I was ready to kiss her...
{Congresswoman Gwen Moore talks about 'power to the poop' with Bill Hemmer...}
And the next thing you know, I'm thrown into the middle of a cesspool. To make matters worse, my tuxedo is ruined and Megyn takes off with another man. Oh, well. C'est la vie! Gwen Moore destroyed my day. I think that manure would be put to better use if it were converted into fertilizer that would be placed on the grass in the Washington, DC mall. That would force the Democrats to leave town very quickly. The Democrats should get out of our government and our excrement immediately. Come to think of it, the two are very similar to each other.
For the sake of full disclosure, I have an autographed picture of Megyn Kelly. I sent her a St. Valentine's card last year. I wrote a note requesting her picture, and she obliged. So at least you know what's on my mind every 52 seconds. But I can't help it. I'm a man and a Republican. Happy St. Patrick's Day!
G.J. LaRouche, 30 March 2009 (originally posted on 17 March 2009 on www.macombgop.com)
The team, the team, the team - part one
The late and famous Michigan football coach Bo Schembechler had one famous saying: the team, the team, the team! General George Patton believed his army worked best as a team. I agree, as do great leaders, that the team is more essential than individuals to get the job done. That being said, I want Mitt Romney to run in 2012 and win. But it’s not what you think. I want Romney to run for Senator Ted Kennedy’s (D-MA) seat in 2012 and beat him.
I understand that a lot of Republicans want to run for President in 2012. Many of them are good people who would make fine Presidents. But for the sake of the Republican team, Romney should make a run for Kennedy’s seat. Think of the progress the Republicans can make here. Kennedy is vulnerable because he is old, sick, and losing that Kennedy aura that has protected him for decades. To have Mitt Romney beat Kennedy would send a strong signal to the Demo-crats that the Republicans are serious about reforming Washington forever.
I know that there is a strong allure for running for President. The temptation is great. But Romney would serve the Republican team best if he beats Ted Kennedy. Kennedy is the lion of the Senate, and an extremely wounded one at that. The Republicans will already have more than enough people running for President. But Romney would serve the team and himself best if he beats the Senate’s liberal standard bearer. He ran against Kennedy in 1994, so he already knows the routine. The people of Massachusetts are going to be demanding a huge change in the Oval Office and in the Senate as the economy worsens, their rights are stripped, and their
senior Senator can no longer deliver on health care or education like he once did. I actually wanted Romney to run against Democratic Senator John Kerry in 2008, but that never happened. Not everybody can play quarterback, but Romney would make an awesome linebacker by sacking that liberal windbag once and for all.
So this is a personal note to Mitt Romney. Run and defeat Ted Kennedy in 2012. You’ll do the Republican Party and yourself proud by doing so. And if Bo Schembechler were alive, he’d tell you the exact same thing. And I’m not here to debate this!
G.J. LaRouche, 30 March 2009
I understand that a lot of Republicans want to run for President in 2012. Many of them are good people who would make fine Presidents. But for the sake of the Republican team, Romney should make a run for Kennedy’s seat. Think of the progress the Republicans can make here. Kennedy is vulnerable because he is old, sick, and losing that Kennedy aura that has protected him for decades. To have Mitt Romney beat Kennedy would send a strong signal to the Demo-crats that the Republicans are serious about reforming Washington forever.
I know that there is a strong allure for running for President. The temptation is great. But Romney would serve the Republican team best if he beats Ted Kennedy. Kennedy is the lion of the Senate, and an extremely wounded one at that. The Republicans will already have more than enough people running for President. But Romney would serve the team and himself best if he beats the Senate’s liberal standard bearer. He ran against Kennedy in 1994, so he already knows the routine. The people of Massachusetts are going to be demanding a huge change in the Oval Office and in the Senate as the economy worsens, their rights are stripped, and their
senior Senator can no longer deliver on health care or education like he once did. I actually wanted Romney to run against Democratic Senator John Kerry in 2008, but that never happened. Not everybody can play quarterback, but Romney would make an awesome linebacker by sacking that liberal windbag once and for all.
So this is a personal note to Mitt Romney. Run and defeat Ted Kennedy in 2012. You’ll do the Republican Party and yourself proud by doing so. And if Bo Schembechler were alive, he’d tell you the exact same thing. And I’m not here to debate this!
G.J. LaRouche, 30 March 2009
The team, the team, the team - part 2
In part one of this series, I suggested that Mitt Romney run against Senator Ted Kennedy (D-MA) because we literally need to eliminate the dead weight in Washington. Now I'm asking for former Republican New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani to run against Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY). Many people have suggested that Giuliani run against Governor David Paterson (D-NY). I think that Schumer would be a bigger and better target. The U.S. Senate is doing an awful amount of damage to this country. Schumer is up for re-election in 2010. Now would be a perfect time to get rid of one of Washington's most notorious liberal Democrats.
Giuliani truly was America's Mayor. During his eight years heading America's toughest city, he was up to the task. Giuliani cut violent crime by 2/3rds, lowered taxes, created great prosperity, lowered the welfare roles, and reduced abortions. He also restored New York City's image and confidence. Guiliani also displayed great courage and inner strength in the aftermath of 9/11. But since he has left, New York City and New York state has lost some of its luster. Governor Paterson has proposed massive tax hikes to the tune of over $4 billion during these tough economic times. NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg has also increased taxes. One statistic that can capture the current problem in the Big Apple is that out of its 8 million residents, 40,000 of them pay roughly 60% of the tax burden. Imagine that. This means that 0.5% of New Yorkers pay 60% of the government's bills. No wonder people are leaving the city and the state in droves.
And Schumer is a huge catalyst in this problem. He has supported every stimulus bill and every tax increase that President Obama has proposed or has already signed into law. He supports this unconstitutional law to tax the $165 million worth of bonuses of AIG workers and endorses the proposed 10 per cent cut in our military. Schumer is nothing but a worthless demagogue who wants to fleece American freedoms and liberties. It's time for him to go, and Giuliani is the perfect man to show him the way out. He has the political capital, experience, integrity, intel-ligence, and money to defeat Schumer.
One of Frank Sinatra's most famous songs was New York, New York. One of the lines from that song is 'if I can make it there, I can make it anywhere.' Well, Rudy Giuliani has proven that he can make it in New York City; he can certainly make it in Washington. Schumer can't make it anywhere. He thinks we don't care about all those porky amendments that have wasted billions of dollars in taxes. Let's prove to Charles Schumer that he can at least make it out of the United States Senate.
G.J. LaRouche, 30 March 2009
Giuliani truly was America's Mayor. During his eight years heading America's toughest city, he was up to the task. Giuliani cut violent crime by 2/3rds, lowered taxes, created great prosperity, lowered the welfare roles, and reduced abortions. He also restored New York City's image and confidence. Guiliani also displayed great courage and inner strength in the aftermath of 9/11. But since he has left, New York City and New York state has lost some of its luster. Governor Paterson has proposed massive tax hikes to the tune of over $4 billion during these tough economic times. NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg has also increased taxes. One statistic that can capture the current problem in the Big Apple is that out of its 8 million residents, 40,000 of them pay roughly 60% of the tax burden. Imagine that. This means that 0.5% of New Yorkers pay 60% of the government's bills. No wonder people are leaving the city and the state in droves.
And Schumer is a huge catalyst in this problem. He has supported every stimulus bill and every tax increase that President Obama has proposed or has already signed into law. He supports this unconstitutional law to tax the $165 million worth of bonuses of AIG workers and endorses the proposed 10 per cent cut in our military. Schumer is nothing but a worthless demagogue who wants to fleece American freedoms and liberties. It's time for him to go, and Giuliani is the perfect man to show him the way out. He has the political capital, experience, integrity, intel-ligence, and money to defeat Schumer.
One of Frank Sinatra's most famous songs was New York, New York. One of the lines from that song is 'if I can make it there, I can make it anywhere.' Well, Rudy Giuliani has proven that he can make it in New York City; he can certainly make it in Washington. Schumer can't make it anywhere. He thinks we don't care about all those porky amendments that have wasted billions of dollars in taxes. Let's prove to Charles Schumer that he can at least make it out of the United States Senate.
G.J. LaRouche, 30 March 2009
Saturday, March 28, 2009
How to celebrate President Ronald Reagan's 100th birthday
Two years from now, America will be marking a very special anniversary that will coincide with an annual American festivity. February 6th, 2011 will mark the 100th birthday of President Ronald Reagan, the greatest
President of the 20th century and my personal favorite. Yet this also marks the day that Super Bowl XLV will be played since it is now held on the first Sunday in February. The Republican Party should work together with the
National Football League to combine these two events into one spectacular day.
The Republican Party can promote Reagan's 100th birthday as the biggest event since the birth of Jesus Christ.
Okay, perhaps not that big, but we can make it close. Think of the possibilities here. The Republican Party can pass out t-shirts and even football jerseys marking Reagan's birthday. President Reagan's family can go onto the field before the game to flip the Super Bowl coin, which of course would have Reagan's face on it. The Repub-lican Party can run commercials paying tribute to Reagan's life and greatness. It would be a wonderful occasion.
But what would really make this sweet is that it would run an emotional dagger through the hearts of liberals. They would appear very foolish trying to criticize the Republicans for paying tribute to its modern-day patriarch,
especially since they are doing such a wonderful job ruining this country. They already looked stupid going after Rush Limbaugh because he wants President Barack Obama's policies to fail. The Republican Party and the NFL
can turn this into one glorious event. It will certainly be morning in America again.
G.J. LaRouche (originally printed on 9 March 2009 on www.macombgop.com)
President of the 20th century and my personal favorite. Yet this also marks the day that Super Bowl XLV will be played since it is now held on the first Sunday in February. The Republican Party should work together with the
National Football League to combine these two events into one spectacular day.
The Republican Party can promote Reagan's 100th birthday as the biggest event since the birth of Jesus Christ.
Okay, perhaps not that big, but we can make it close. Think of the possibilities here. The Republican Party can pass out t-shirts and even football jerseys marking Reagan's birthday. President Reagan's family can go onto the field before the game to flip the Super Bowl coin, which of course would have Reagan's face on it. The Repub-lican Party can run commercials paying tribute to Reagan's life and greatness. It would be a wonderful occasion.
But what would really make this sweet is that it would run an emotional dagger through the hearts of liberals. They would appear very foolish trying to criticize the Republicans for paying tribute to its modern-day patriarch,
especially since they are doing such a wonderful job ruining this country. They already looked stupid going after Rush Limbaugh because he wants President Barack Obama's policies to fail. The Republican Party and the NFL
can turn this into one glorious event. It will certainly be morning in America again.
G.J. LaRouche (originally printed on 9 March 2009 on www.macombgop.com)
Another notorious earmark (joke!)
I've conducted further research on how the Democrats want to waste our hard-earned cash. The $410 billion omnibus bill contains an earmark put in by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA). She appropriated $50,000
so that the Octomom, Nadya Suleman, can receive an emergency hysterectomy. Can't our taxes go to better use? Oh, wait a minute. I get it. This may actually be a good thing. This is an investment in the future so that the Octomom won't have additional children that'll cost us millions of dollars more in taxes.
Now I'm as pro-life as you can get, but some people just aren't suited to be parents. Here's a woman who's had 14 children all conceived via in vitro fertilization. Do you know what that means? That means she's had all of these kids without even having the satisfaction of a man to get her pregnant in the first place. Not that any man would want to volunteer, except for maybe Bill Clinton. All jokes aside, this is a serious situation. She's an unmarried woman on welfare. She had no business having the six kids she already had, much less the octuplets she just brought into the world. Yet I also blame the fertility clinic and the people there who were willing to let Ms. Suleman bring children into this world who would grow up in a very stressful environment. I know the Octomom loves kids, but she should've just been a kindergarten teacher like others have suggested.
Hindsight is always 20/20. Perhaps we should've given Nadya Suleman that hysterectomy ten years ago so the taxpayers wouldn't be forced to pay for the care of 14 children in vitro and out of wedlock. But things are what they are. My advice to the Octomom, since she looks so much like Angelina Jolie, is that she should hook up with Brad Pitt (although not romantically) and hope he keeps making movies for the next 30 years to pay for those 14 precious children. Yet that hysterectomy sounds more and more like a good idea. An ounce of pre-
vention is worth a pound of cure.
G.J. LaRouche (originally printed on 6 March 2009 on www.macombgop.com)
so that the Octomom, Nadya Suleman, can receive an emergency hysterectomy. Can't our taxes go to better use? Oh, wait a minute. I get it. This may actually be a good thing. This is an investment in the future so that the Octomom won't have additional children that'll cost us millions of dollars more in taxes.
Now I'm as pro-life as you can get, but some people just aren't suited to be parents. Here's a woman who's had 14 children all conceived via in vitro fertilization. Do you know what that means? That means she's had all of these kids without even having the satisfaction of a man to get her pregnant in the first place. Not that any man would want to volunteer, except for maybe Bill Clinton. All jokes aside, this is a serious situation. She's an unmarried woman on welfare. She had no business having the six kids she already had, much less the octuplets she just brought into the world. Yet I also blame the fertility clinic and the people there who were willing to let Ms. Suleman bring children into this world who would grow up in a very stressful environment. I know the Octomom loves kids, but she should've just been a kindergarten teacher like others have suggested.
Hindsight is always 20/20. Perhaps we should've given Nadya Suleman that hysterectomy ten years ago so the taxpayers wouldn't be forced to pay for the care of 14 children in vitro and out of wedlock. But things are what they are. My advice to the Octomom, since she looks so much like Angelina Jolie, is that she should hook up with Brad Pitt (although not romantically) and hope he keeps making movies for the next 30 years to pay for those 14 precious children. Yet that hysterectomy sounds more and more like a good idea. An ounce of pre-
vention is worth a pound of cure.
G.J. LaRouche (originally printed on 6 March 2009 on www.macombgop.com)
A notorious earmark in the 2010 budget (joke!)
Upon doing research on how the Democrats want to waste our money, I discovered a notorious earmark in President Barack Obama's $3.6 trillion budget for Fiscal Year 2010. It's an earmark that will cost American taxpayers $30 billion. It is an infrastructure project appropriated for a new office building for the Defense Department. The project will replace the old building - which is THE PENTAGON, of course - with a new structure. The plan will bulldoze THE PENTAGON, which was built during World War II, and erect a new edifice in its place. The new building will have only four sides to it. When finally completed in the year 2020, the new building will be called THE SQUARE. The actual cost of this project will greatly exceed $30 billion. The Democrats will stoop to any level to eliminate the morale of the military.
This is obviously a comical spoof of how our politicians love to waste our money. But don't laugh too hard because they could actually do this.
G.J. LaRouche (originally printed on 5 March 2009 on www.macombgop.com)
This is obviously a comical spoof of how our politicians love to waste our money. But don't laugh too hard because they could actually do this.
G.J. LaRouche (originally printed on 5 March 2009 on www.macombgop.com)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
